Socrates spent or so of his life in capital of Greece. During his life he witnessed the rise and exuberate of A becauses and the rapid decline of Athens during the Peloponnesian war. Socrates met and talked with a variety of deal much(prenominal) as politicians, statesmen, sophists, poets, architects, and ordinary citizens. He taught philosophy to the call professess of Athens, devoted friends, and pupils kindred Crito. Plato was atomic number 53 of Socrates students, and he is considered to be most brilliant student of Socrates. In position, Plato is the study source of nonicelight-emitting diodege intimately Socrates life.Socrates pursuitioned and get across-exa tapd Athenians about their moral, religious, and political dogmas. People found it unwieldy to understand him. His habits were strange, and his crinkles were hard to understand. Socrates created a transformation in Greek philosophy. Plato portrayed this transition in defensive measure of Socrates, Euthy phro, and Crito. Socratic order is char fermenterized by asking hesitations. When Socrates talks, he asks the questions each the time. He teaches and refutes with questions. He talks to bulk with questions.The central element that up machinate the Athenians was the foul cross-examination of the principles and beliefs that Athenians lived by, which consequently led to Socrates remainder because his coevals did non want to hold up their consume ignorance. Socrates was searching for the meaning of things he valued proof of what was defined which would give formal reason for itself. The fact that really infract Athenians was the attack of the most fundamental principles of Athenian life. Socrates did not recruit state to observe him rather he went out and asked them their views.His lectures were not characterized by forcing his ideas onto former(a) people. The individuals brought their point of views on particular subject in conferences set up by Socrates. Socrates way o f examen or challenging a belief is by seeing what believer is affiliated to. A while, who suck ups a statement, especially in debate with Socrates, must be mensural what he cl fetchs to know. whizz of the examples is a chat mingled with Euthyphro and Socrates. They both confound pending fittingnesssuits. Socrates is incriminate of impiety, and Euthyphro is going to prosecute his suffer pay off.Euthyphros father is focussingd with violent death a twenty-four hour period-laborer. accord to Euthyphro his actions to prosecute his father is a model for piety. It doesnt payoff if the guilty one is a copulation or a stranger, murder is murder. Euthyphro warrant his actions by saying that he knows what divine or un hallowed is. Socrates wants to know what is hallowed or un consecrate since he was accused of impiety, and it seems that Euthyphro has exact knowledge of religion. The discussion between Socrates and Euthyphro illustrate an alternative approach to servi ce.Euthyphros answer to what is holy is in a form that lists individual actions. Socrates presents the questions that be mutually exclusive. For example,is the holy loved by the deitys because it is holy? Or is it holy because it is loved? He asks plenty of questions like that. Euthyphro (the respondent) has to make a choice between the alternatives presented. Socrates accepts what is a false answer to his question. The dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro present the un true statement. The definition of holy was not discovered. This cross examination do Euthyphro rattling uncomfortable.As Socrates demonstrated, Euthyphro did not have exact knowledge of religion and what holy or unholy is. If Euthyphro, who is professionally devoted to religion, cannot produce an adequate answer or some(a) valid touchstone of holy, it is hardly to be expected that Athenian citizens will provide intelligent answers to such questions. Socrates was weightd with irreligion, impiety, and cor ruption of youth. The Defence of Socrates is dissever into three speeches. The opening is the criticism of the peroration in the flirt, and Socrates is carried away by the speeches of his accusers. His defense is base on the word rectitude. At the showtime of the speech he makes it clear that he is interested only in truth my accusers have say little or nothing true whereas from me you shall hear the totally truth The speeches in beg in general have no relation to truth. The loudspeakers aim to persuade others in believing what the speaker is saying. Socrates is compelled to make speech in court to defend himself. Socrates replaces the speech that is common in Athenian courts and exercises his deliver kind of cross-examination, whenever rightfulness permits him to do so. He proceeds tally to his method of examining by questions and answers.Also, he wishes to speak with judges for more than one day and perhaps convince them that his accusers are impairment. Socrates a cquired a crappy reputation because he has some special wisdom as his accusers are saying. This is based on the account of Chaerephon, Socrates friend. Chaerephon asked the Delphian oracle who is the wisest. The oracles answer was that Socrates is the wisest. When Socrates heard the story, he was perplexed how this perhaps could be the truth. Socrates went and questioned poets, craftsman, and politicians. He made enemies for himself during his quest for wisdom. Socrates recognise and formed opinion that, although the man thought to be wise by umpteen other people, and especially himself, all the aforesaid(prenominal) in reality he was not. through and through with(predicate) this mould Socrates came to conclusion that only god is truly wise, and Socrates wisdom is worth nothing. With this excuse Socrates sets up tension against the pixilated care of impiety. For Socrates, piety refers to his mission based on the conviction that he and others are ignorant. Socrates rec eptive through examination the ignorance of others. They claimed they knew something, when in fact they did not know anything. Socrates made people retrieve and find the truth.Once they were exposed to Socrates questioning, they realized they were ignorant and no truth was found. Because Athenians had a reputation to protect, they brought absurd charges against him. Next, the substantial populations of Athens, the judges, the members of the crowd are claiming to be educators, except Socrates. This absurd exaggeration expresses the sophistic relativism and is ironic, since Socrates is accused of cosmos a sophist. We must make a clear distinction between the two. First, sophists charged fees for their services, next sophists in Athens were not citizens and they traveled throughout the Greek world.Finally, the sophist would use or find the pedigree that worked the best and did not care whether they exposed the truth. Socrates did not charge fees, was an Athenian citizen, and beli eved in uncovering the truth. Additionally, there is another absurdity concealed in Socrates indictment. Socrates asks Meletos if he is debauch youth intentionally or unintentionally. Meletos replies without hesitation-intentionally. Socrates said that his wrongdoing is impossible. If Socrates is so stupid that he does not realize that he harms other, then he must do it unintentionally.Also, Socrates makes a clever annotation towards Meletus Are you so much smarter at your age than mine as to realize that the bad have a harmful impact upon their hand-to-hand companions at any given time, whereas the nice have a beneficial answer? Socrates beg offs that if he is corrupting youth he must do it unintentionally, and according to the law he should not be brought to court based on such a mistake. To add, he explains other reasons wherefore alleged(a) corruption of youth might be happening. Since all others are teachers of the youth, they should teach the youth dependableice and what is right.Evidently, they failed to do so, since Socrates has so many loyal heeders. Finally, there is Socrates defense against the charge that he does not extol gods. According to Socrates, this charge is too vague. He asked his accuser to make the point more precisely and explain it. Socrates begins to ask Meletos a series of questions. One of the Meletus charges is that Socrates does not acknowledge gods and claims that the sun and the synodic month are made of rocks. Socrates exclaims that this is mistaken identity. It is Anaxagoras of Clazomenae who made such a claim in his books which you can get anywhere for a cheap price.Socrates makes another clever remark that he does not believe that members of jury are illiterate and therefore they should know that Meletus charge is absurd. Furthermore, Socrates questioned Meletus and came to conclusion that according to Meletus, Socrates believes in some sort of spiritual being. Socrates ends with the question How could you pos sibly persuade anyone with even slightest discussion that someone who accepts spiritual beings does not alike accepts divine ones, and again that the same soulfulness in any case accepts neither spirits nor gods nor heroes? Socrates refuted the charge of impiety by showing through questioning, that he could not be a despiser of gods since he believes in spiritual beings and descendants of gods. Socrates exposed Meletos self-contradiction, ignorance, and ignorance of the judges and jury, since they allowed charges to be brought to the court. In addition, Socrates takes unmistakable delight in the process of uncovering ones ignorance. followers the custom, Socrates must propose the proper penalisation for himself. Socrates considers a variety of punishments. He examined his give life.He believed that he fulfilled the duty towards the whole community by examining others and himself and did not wrong anybody. The exile would not be seize punishment. Socrates proposes that his pe nalty should be free meals, since he is doing a severe thing in Athens. Socrates stands his ground as is portrayed in the third part of his speech. He accepts his death penalty, but also he warns his executioners that set people to death will not prevent anyone from living unjustly and in ignorance. Socrates is convinced that his philosophical life of examining his own and other Athenians beliefs and actions is his duty.He does not fear death. He does not know if death is good or bad. Socrates warns Athenians not to value wealth, power, and prestigiousness more than moral worthiness. The moral excellence is the best possible state of ones soul. Socrates commitment to reasoned argument is evident in Crito. There, in communication with Crito, Socrates justifies his decision to remain in prison. Crito listed the reasons why Socrates should escape. First, Crito does not want to lose a friend, next what will other think that Crito doesnt want to make apply for his friend.Socrates b egins with the reply that he must follow the logic I cannot reject the very principle that I previously adopted, just because this fate has overtaken me rather they appeared to me much the same as ever, and I respect and honor the same ones that I did before. This principle is deep down him and appears to be the best, regardless of situation. Additionally, Socrates examined his own morality. For Socrates, the sterling(prenominal) good is to be prudent and wickedness is to be imprudent. Prudence is the ability to act by use of reason and allows to list when acts are reckless, cowardly or courageous.Socrates, also examined other of his principles such as not to do injustice, not to do bad things to other human beings, obey the laws of Athens, which he voluntary accepted. Yet again through the questioning of his own principles and in dialogue with Crito, Socrates comes to conclusion, that one shouldnt care what other people think, but think what is just or unjust. If Socrates wou ld escape, he would violate the inviolate laws of Athens. The escape would be unjust. Socrates reasoned that if he would escape, the life time of his work would be destroyed.He dedicated his life to justice, to the state, and the law. Socrates must stand his teachings trough his actions. On the whole, Socrates during his lifetime pursue the truth. For Socrates, the truth was the only moral rachis in uncertain world. His method was direct. He asked questions in dialogues with anyone who would engage in conversation. This dialectical process was a purifying process. analogous to water filter, removing all the scum and deposit until results were pure. Socrates revealed through this process what is untruth.For Socrates, the inner truth is covered by the layers of untruth, and he act to peel them away. This method is also cognize as negative method-eliminate what leads to contradiction. Socrates forced his propagation to re-evaluate, reflect and reconsider their beliefs. He did this in the ways that left people with uncertainty, in the state of unease, and realization of their own ignorance (but not admitting to it) as Plato portrayed in Euthyphro, Crito and Defence of Socrates. Furthermore, the Oracle of Delphi response to Chaerephon, who is the wisest man, provided Socrates with insights to education.The most goodish motivation to learning is acknowledgment of own ignorance. Next, Socratic Method seeks to find prevalent definition. Socrates believed that all things have something essential within them which can be uncovered by reason. The essential properties can be summarized in definition. For example, he seeks to find the definition what is holy or unholy in Euthyphro. The results of Socrates enquires in search for truth, knowledge, and wisdom through cross-examination, led to his death, because his contemporaries did not to want admit their own ignorance.